𝗖𝗢𝗨𝗣 𝗥𝗜𝗦𝗞𝗦 𝗜𝗦𝗢𝗟𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗭𝗜𝗠𝗕𝗔𝗕𝗪𝗘 𝗙𝗥𝗢𝗠 𝗦𝗔𝗗𝗖 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗔𝗨 – 𝗠𝗢𝗥𝗘 𝗘𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗢𝗠𝗜𝗖 𝗛𝗔𝗥𝗗𝗦𝗛𝗜𝗣𝗦, 𝗪𝗛𝗜𝗟𝗘 𝟮𝟬𝟯𝟬 𝗥𝗜𝗦𝗞𝗦 𝗜𝗡𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗕𝗜𝗟𝗜𝗧𝗬.

Bombshell Geza insinuating that they intend to remove the government through a coup.

Zimbabwe has endured tumultuous times over the past 24 years due to sanctions—sanctions that many supported and did not resist. These sanctions devastated national unity, families, and the economy, leading to brain drain, loss of forex reserves, destruction of businesses, reduced tax revenue, and a shrinking labor force. Despite the challenges, the government appears unaware of the full impact of sanctions, and due to this misdiagnosis, there seems to be no clear strategy for economic recovery, even after sanctions on the nation were lifted, though they remain on some leaders.

At the same time, corruption has deeply infiltrated society. Many Zimbabweans, struggling to survive, have become mere consumers rather than producers. The nation has lost its moral compass, and now, a culture of survival at any cost has taken root—smuggling, drug peddling, bribery, and currency speculation have become the norm, eroding value addition and fueling a cycle of economic decay despite the GDP and economy growing. Instead of taking collective responsibility, blame is constantly shifted.

In search of a quick fix, some now advocate for a coup, hoping for change. But does political change alone guarantee economic transformation and better livelihoods? South Africa transitioned from Zuma to Ramaphosa, Zimbabwe from Mugabe to Mnangagwa, and Zambia from Lungu to Hichilema—yet have these changes significantly improved people's lives?

More critically, would an undemocratic regime change improve Zimbabwe’s situation? A coup or unconstitutional transition risks severe consequences, including isolation and sanctions from the AU and SADC, which would further worsen economic conditions in Zimbabwe, And as hardships increase, another coup could follow those who take over now, in a vicious cycle of instability that never delivers real change.

Additionally, the push for 2030—at a time when most Zimbabweans have seen little improvement in their lives despite the rising GDP—raises the risk of factionalism within the ruling party, creating an unstable environment that drives away investment.

As long as Zimbabweans refuse to acknowledge the full impact of sanctions, we will fail to rebuild what was destroyed:

•Brain drain

•Investment flight

•The collapse of banking relationships

•The rise of corruption fueled by economic hardships

•Increasing inequality

•The tarnished image of Zimbabwe as a brand

A misdiagnosis of Zimbabwe’s problems leads to ineffective solutions, which is why, despite a growing GDP, increased exports, and rising production, living standards have not improved, in fact they are deteriorating as a few get richer and masses get poorer. As a result, many now see leadership change as the only solution, forgetting that the removal of Mugabe was once viewed the same way—yet the challenges remain.

Those leaders now pushing for forced leadership change, just as the current government did in 2017, must understand that in five years, they too will face pressure for removal, as they will likely fail to turn the economy around without addressing fundamental pillars eroded by sanctions. Instability breeds more instability.

The Solution

ZANU PF must unite, bring the public into their confidence and prioritize national interests over factional battles. The leadership must make a decision that serves the people, rather than being driven by internal power struggles. Without long-term stability and sound economic policies, Zimbabwe will continue to face cycles of political and economic turmoil like west Africa.